Ò׽ؽØÍ¼Èí¼þ¡¢µ¥Îļþ¡¢Ãâ°²×°¡¢´¿ÂÌÉ«¡¢½ö160KB

[·­Òë]High Performance JavaScript(024)

Data Format Conclusions  Êý¾Ý¸ñʽ×ܽá
    Favor lightweight formats in general; the best are JSON and a character-delimited custom format. If the data set is large and parse time becomes an issue, use one of these two techniques:
    ×ܵÄÀ´ËµÔ½ÇáÁ¿¼¶µÄ¸ñʽԽºÃ£¬×îºÃÊÇJSONºÍ×Ö·û·Ö¸ôµÄ×Ô¶¨Òå¸ñʽ¡£Èç¹ûÊý¾Ý¼¯ºÜ´ó»òÕß½âÎöʱ¼ä³ÉÎÊÌ⣬ÄÇô¾ÍʹÓÃÕâÁ½ÖÖ¸ñʽ֮һ£º
• JSON-P data, fetched using dynamic script tag insertion. This treats the data as executable JavaScript, not a string, and allows for extremely fast parsing. This can be used across domains, but shouldn't be used with sensitive data.
  JSON-PÊý¾Ý£¬Óö¯Ì¬½Å±¾±êÇ©²åÈë·¨»ñÈ¡¡£Ëü½«Êý¾ÝÊÓΪ¿ÉÔËÐеÄJavaScript¶ø²»ÊÇ×Ö·û´®£¬½âÎöËٶȼ«¿ì¡£ËüÄܹ»¿çÓòʹÓ㬵«²»Ó¦Éæ¼°Ãô¸ÐÊý¾Ý¡£
• A character-delimited custom format, fetched using either XHR or dynamic script tag insertion and parsed using split(). This technique parses extremely large datasets slightly faster than the JSON-P technique, and generally has a smaller file size.
  ×Ö·û·Ö¸ôµÄ×Ô¶¨Òå¸ñʽ£¬Ê¹ÓÃXHR»ò¶¯Ì¬½Å±¾±êÇ©²åÈë¼¼ÊõÌáÈ¡£¬Ê¹ÓÃsplit()½âÎö¡£´Ë¼¼ÊõÔÚ½âÎö·Ç³£´óÊý¾Ý¼¯Ê±±ÈJSON-P¼¼ÊõÂԿ죬¶øÇÒͨ³£Îļþ³ß´ç¸üС¡£
    The following table and Figure 7-1 show all of the performance numbers again (in order from slowest to fastest), so that you can compare each of the formats in one place. HTML is excluded, since it isn't directly comparable to the other formats.
    ϱíºÍͼ7-1ÔÙ´ÎÏÔʾÁËËùÓз½·¨µÄÐÔÄÜÊý¾Ý£¨°´ÕÕ´ÓÂýµ½¿ìµÄ˳Ðò£©£¬Äã¿ÉÒÔÔڴ˱ȽÏÿÖÖ¸ñʽµÄÓÅÁÓ¡£HTMLδ°üÀ¨£¬ÒòΪËüÓëÆäËû¸ñʽ²»ÄÜÖ±½Ó±È½Ï¡£
Figure 7-1. A comparison of data format download and parse times
ͼ7-1  ¸÷ÖÖÊý¾Ý¸ñʽÏÂÔØºÍ½âÎöµÄʱ¼ä
    Keep in mind that these numbers are from a single test run in a single browser. The results should be used as general indicators of performance, not as hard numbers. You can run these tests yourself at http://techfoolery.com/formats/.
    Çë×¢Ò⣬ÕâЩÊ


Ïà¹ØÎĵµ£º

Javascript±Õ°ü(Closure)

ClosureÖÐÎÄ·­ÒëΪ±Õ°ü.×ÖÃæÉÏÀ´Àí½â¾ÍÊÇ"·â±ÕµÄ°ü".(ÕâÊÇÒ»¾ä·Ï»°)
±Õ°üÊÇʲô?
ÊéÃæ½âÊÍΪ:
Ëùν“±Õ°ü”£¬Ö¸µÄÊÇÒ»¸öÓµÓÐÐí¶à±äÁ¿ºÍ°ó¶¨ÁËÕâЩ±äÁ¿µÄ»·¾³µÄ±í´ïʽ£¨Í¨³£ÊÇÒ»¸öº¯Êý£©£¬Òò¶øÕâЩ±äÁ¿Ò²ÊǸñí´ïʽµÄÒ»²¿·Ö¡£
ÎÒÈÏΪ±Õ°ü¾ÍÊÇÄܹ»¶Á/дº¯ÊýÄÚ²¿µÄijЩ±äÁ¿µÄ×Óº¯Êý,²¢½«ÕâЩ±äÁ¿±£´æ ......

[·­Òë]High Performance JavaScript(017)

A Note on Benchmarking  ²âÊÔ»ù׼˵Ã÷
    Because a regex's performance can be wildly different depending on the text it's applied to, there's no straightforward way to benchmark regexes against each other. For the best result, you need to benchmark your regexes on test strings o ......

[·­Òë]High Performance JavaScript(021)

Splitting Up Tasks  ·Ö½âÈÎÎñ
    What we typically think of as one task can often be broken down into a series of subtasks. If a single function is taking too long to execute, check to see whether it can be broken down into a series of smaller functions that complete in smaller ......

[·­Òë]High Performance JavaScript(023)

Data Formats  Êý¾Ý¸ñʽ
    When considering data transmission techniques, you must take into account several factors: feature set, compatibility, performance, and direction (to or from the server). When considering data formats, the only scale you need for comparison is speed.
......
© 2009 ej38.com All Rights Reserved. ¹ØÓÚE½¡ÍøÁªÏµÎÒÃÇ | Õ¾µãµØÍ¼ | ¸ÓICP±¸09004571ºÅ